He was sworn in by President Pranab Mukherjee and his 13-month-long tenure as the CJI will end on Jan. 3, 2017.
Shri Justice Tirath Singh Thakur was sworn in as the 43rd Chief Justice of India by #PresidentMukherjee today pic.twitter.com/shnSV6yGvy
— President of India (@RashtrapatiBhvn) December 3, 2015
During his tenure in the Supreme Court, Justice Thakur has been the face of many landmark judgements. Here is a look at some of them:
1. Against Meat Ban During a Jain Festival

"The poet Kabir said 'why do you peek into the homes of those who use meat, let them do what they do, but why are you so bothered about them, brother'... You see, there should be an amount of tolerance and sensitivity to other communities also," said Justice Thakur while rejecting the plea.
2. On Polygamy:

Picture for representation only: Nishanth Jois/Flickr
In February 2015, a bench consisting of Justices Thakur and A K Goel had said that polygamy is not an intrinsic part of any religion and the government can frame laws to regulate it. He ruled that a Muslim’s fundamental right to practice Islam did not include polygamy.3. Of Changes in BCCI

4. Action Against the Drug Menace

Picture for representation only. Source: Kaushik Narasimhan/Flickr
In 2012, a bench headed by Justice Thakur ordered an official operation to trace the data of narcotics confiscated in the last 10 years. This was the first official exercise of this kind. The three year long operation finally revealed that only 16 lakh kg, out of the 51.4 lakh kg of narcotics confiscated over the last 10 years, was destroyed.“Drug problem has become a serious issue. A total of 67% population of Punjab is addicted to different kinds of drugs. What worries the most is that 60% population of India is young and 67 per cent youth are addicted to drugs," he said in a recent judicial conference on 'Drug Menace in India: Overview, Challenges and Solutions' that was held in Manali. He added that India needs enforcement of strict laws against drugs.
5. On Compensation for Victims of Crime

Source: Brian Turner/Flickr
On Feb. 27, 2015, a bench of Justice T.S. Thakur and Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel, ruled that in cases where the accused is unable to pay the required compensation to the victim or his/her family, then the State government should pay the same compensation as ordered by the court.“We are also of the view that where the accused is unable to pay adequate compensation to the victim or his heir, the Court ought to have awarded compensation under Section 357A against the State from the funds available under the Victim Compensation Scheme framed under the said Section,” said the judgement.